Rit
a
ARTMENT CF THE NAVY
po i Ld
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON VIRGINIA 22204-2480
BAN
Docket No .NRO2407-14
b August 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Use 1552.
BR three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August
2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accoraance with administrative yeguiations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board congisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by the Waval Personnel Command (NPC)
memo 1439 Ser g12/0200 of 7 July 2014, a COPY of which is being
provided to you.
The Board also notes that you have applied for 4 correction to your
record for an error that allegedly occurred more than 25 years ago-
Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction
of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery
of the alleged error. Failure to file within the prescribed three
years may be excused only in cases where the poard finds that it is in
Although you neglected to assert your claim for .an inordinately jong
period of time without justification and you provided no evidence as
to why you did not seek to have the alleged error corrected earlier,
the Board stiil decided to review your case. Therefore, after careful
and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found
that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the
existence of probable material error or injustice. In this
eonnection, the Board concurred with the comments contained in che
advisory opinion. accordingly, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel wilt be furnished upon
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitied te have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In chis
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that 4 presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a eorrection of an official naval recora, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
“Te : Sa
ROBERT D. ZGALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7241 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 5 June 2014, a copy of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5583 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board: consisted.of your application, tegether with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7111 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were also provided an opportunity to respond within 30 days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2459 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. n making this determination, the Board concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1221 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2014. in addition, the Board consigered the advisory opinion furnished by MCRC memo 1610 G-i dated 30 April 2014, a COPY of which 1s attached. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR12735 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in 1 support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, y regulations, and poli¢ies. tn addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 27 March 2013, 21 August 2013, and 4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7251 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicabie statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9935 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, ‘es, In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) , dated 20 August 2014, a copy of which is reful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6066 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 November 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser Wi30C/14U1348 dated 15 October 2014, a copy of which was sent to you on 18 October 2014; it was returned to sender on 5 November 2014. De Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2120 14
The Board also considered your letters dated 8 August and 13 November 2014 each with enclosures. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.